User firstname.lastname@example.org wrote about ver. 2.71 2012-03-09
haha, thank you, tapi masalahnya ane kagak faham brow :d haha My rating:5
User wrote about ver. 2.71 2011-01-07
super My rating:5
User nowhere wrote about ver. 2.71 2010-03-30
OMGWTFLOL I dont think you all bought it for 600$ My rating:1
User email@example.com wrote about ver. 2.10.142 2008-10-06
User MauzZ wrote about ver. 1.6.74 2007-09-04
Very powerfull software! Does anyone have infos about the best hardware configuration to obtain the best performances? Better Pentium 4 or Dual Core?
User istanbul wrote about ver. 1.6.74 2007-08-09
a very good program My rating:5
User firstname.lastname@example.org wrote about ver. 1.6.74 2007-05-07
GOOD SOFTWARE My rating:4
User slasher wrote about ver. 1.1.22 2007-01-29
excellent, could do with more encryption types though My rating:5
User Atul_porwal2000@yahoo.co.in wrote about ver. 1.1.22 2006-12-29
The Software is too good i use one time this soft. for demostration. My rating:3
User c4p0ne wrote about ver. 1.1.22 2006-09-14
Excellent piece of software. Too expensive which is why we were forced to card a 20-license version (which at the time should have been enough for our needs, and was).
Secondly, this puppy needs to SUPPORT MANY MORE ENCRYPTION TYPES! PGP self-decrypting archives is an excellent start since I know of NO other software that cracks PGP. However, PGP isn't the only thing under the sun folks. More encryption types should be supported especially for those EXCRUCIATINGLY slow-to-brute algos like RAR which often run sub-100 pp/s (my god the humanity).
Otherwise very well thought out software, recommended if you can afford it (one way or another). ;)